Washington - After considering how combat might be conducted in many different environments, the U.S. Army is changing its approach to long-range electronic warfare, signals intelligence and cyber systems.

The U.S. Army will customize long-range jammer device for the European and Indo-Pacific theater

The Land Layer System-Brigade and Above Echelon (TLS-EAB) is intended for use by larger Army formations, including divisions and armies with thousands of troops and extensive firepower. The system is considered a key part of the service's "depth awareness" strategy - the ability to identify, monitor, target and engage adversaries from longer distances with greater precision.

Mark Kitz, head of the Program Executive Office for Intelligence, Electronic Warfare and Sensors (PEO IEW&S), said the Army is "evolving our approach to acquisition," especially for flexibility. For example, the Indo-Pacific region, where the United States could come into conflict with China, and Europe, where the United States could come into conflict with Russia, have very different objectives and terrain.

"The Indo-Pacific Command looks very different from Africa, very different from anywhere," he said. "We can't just put together a cookie-cutter solution that barely works in that combatant command."

Defense officials consider China and Russia to be serious threats to national security. Both invest in military science and technology and are believed to be able to impede or defend against U.S. military communications, targeting, and attack.

The Army signed separate agreements with Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics Mission Systems in August for the TLS-EAB concept and demonstration. The first phase is valued at $15 million for 11 months. Lockheed and General Dynamics rank among the world's five largest defense contractors by revenue, according to Defense News analysis.

ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates - The CEO of Taiwanese company Tron Future says the system is ready for large-scale deployment, with production rates expected to reach 100 units per month by 2023. The company's anti-drone radar is already in use by the Taiwanese army. As demand increases.

​

Supplier says anti-drone radar ready for 'large-scale deployment' in Taiwan

Tron Future is only four years old, but its T.Radar Pro technology has already found a wide market in Taiwan, the Middle East and South Asia. The drones with the Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar can detect distances of up to 5 kilometers and weigh just 15 kilograms, which is what CEO Yujiu Wang said attracted customers the most.

"The radar was designed out of the need to build layered defenses in the air to protect Taiwan from the constant threat of different types of Chinese UAVs," Wang said in an interview at the IDEX arms show.

He explained that its development was guided by four principles: keeping it light and small; Equipped with 4D micro-Doppler function to distinguish multi-rotor drones and birds; Low cost; And performance against small, medium and low-altitude flying targets in urban environments.

The threat from Chinese drones has increased in recent years. In January 2023, a Chinese military magazine stressed that in the event of war in the Taiwan Strait, unmanned aerial systems would play a vital role in targeted strikes.

Wang said that at the height of the tensions, deployed radars detected as many as 100 Chinese drones conducting surveillance over Taiwan in one week. Key features of T.Radar Pro include an open architecture for image recognition applications, air traffic management, and interfaces for hard or soft kill countermeasures. It has a power consumption of 250 watts and a maximum signal bandwidth of 30 MHZ.

Initially, these radars were in service with the Taiwan Army and deployed over key islands, a challenging environment where the movement of waves in the ocean can create false targets.

Based on growing domestic and international demand, the company expects to produce 100 radars per month in the coming year and is considering opening a second production site in Taiwan. The T.Radar can be sold separately or as part of Tron Future's larger anti-drone system. The complete setup also includes a drone jammer and an interceptor, which the company's website describes as offering "a choice of explosive or non-destructive warheads to handle different situations." The company claims that the system together creates a defensive protective dome with a diameter of 5 kilometers.

Wang stressed that Taiwan's military does not want to be the first to attack in the face of China, as this could quickly escalate into an all-out war. The air defense platform is designed with this in mind, where each different system represents a logical chain that tries to avoid the use of hard kill countermeasures in the first place.

By Elisabeth Gosselin-Malo

Milan, Italy - Anti-drone weapons manufacturers say they are increasingly miniaturizing and simplifying their solutions to meet the growing demand for man-portable weapons as recent conflicts highlight the importance of mobile capabilities.

Portable counter-drone systems (C-UAS) have been around for some time, but their proliferation has accelerated in recent years amid the growing threat of weaponized commercial drones. In the 2019 C-UAS Database report compiled by Bard College's Center for Drone Research, 111 (21 percent) of the 537 market products analyzed were handheld solutions offered by more than 29 different countries.

Warren Brown, vice president of marketing at Fortem Technologies, explained that the purposes and ways in which these systems are used today have also changed over the past decade. "Historically, security details and protection for major events or critical infrastructure have been focused on fixed solutions. Recent conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine have shifted the focus to 'mobile' systems that offer advanced radar detection capabilities, ease of deployment and portability, low overall operating costs, and low cost per use, "he said. The belief that counter-drone systems measures must be large-scale to be effective also appears to have changed to some extent.

Previously, many militaries relied on more traditional jamming signal alternatives to counter enemy UAVs because they lacked access or resources to more appropriate and reliable systems. However, Brown said that relying on the deployment of legacy equipment is not always effective because they are not necessarily developed to address the comprehensive and evolving technology behind the drone threat.

"Traditional cell phone jamming solutions have a low success rate, forcing people to use expensive and impractical systems, such as large missile weapons, or even deploy fighter jets to try to mitigate the threat - which is often ineffective against small, maneuverable and hard-to-detect drones," he said. The recent failed attempt by South Korea to shoot down its neighbor's drone for several hours shows this.

Manufacturers have taken note of these issues, redesigning on top of existing technologies to more effectively address the dangers posed by drones, especially smaller ones that may be more difficult to deal with. In May 2022, Fortem Technology sent portable DroneHunters to Ukraine, saying in a press release that the company took an existing C-UAS system and further miniaturized and simplified it for use as an expeditionary rapid deployment weapon.

Matt McCrann, CEO of DroneShield, believes this illustrates where this type of technology is headed. "Of course, our goal is always to take a feature and make it easier to use, more efficient and more cost effective." Smaller, better, cheaper, "he said.

DroneShield's handheld countermeasures, such as DroneGuns, offer many advantages. As a small, lightweight system with easy-to-transport anti-drone system capabilities, it can be stored in a sling in a vehicle, backpack or body as the battlefield changes.

Powered by replaceable batteries, DroneGuns are non-kinetic and employ an electronic attack method, which means they can deliver unlimited "bullets" that are more economical than kinetic systems and can be operated more safely with minimal training.

In a similar way, other portable systems, such as Fortem's DroneHunters F700, offer countries a lower cost-per-use alternative than other higher-priced systems on the market. Brown pointed out that their weapons cost just a few hundred dollars per shot, which is much cheaper than high-energy systems such as electromagnetic pulse (laser) weapons, which also require a lot of power.

Another benefit of the Fortem system for suppressing UAVs is that the system can use cone-sleeve parachutes to shoot them down in a controlled manner, allowing reconnaissance and analysis of enemy systems and reducing collateral damage. This is in contrast to more traditional defense techniques, which can cause an enemy drone to explode or fall from the sky, often harming civilians and infrastructure in the process, or allowing it to return to its launch point without the need for potential research into its mission or location. It comes from.

Brown claims that in Fortem's more than 5,000 record captures, its solution has a 92% success rate. During the FIFA World Cup in Qatar, DroneHunters were further deployed to protect multiple stadiums. For DroneShield, McCrann said they are highly effective in both military and more traditional security environments, pointing to the recent example of using its DroneGun Tactical to neutralize four hovering drones during Brazil's presidential inauguration.

Despite the many advantages of these systems, MacLean warns that scaling down any given feature usually involves one or more trade-offs. "For electronic countermeasures, this (miniaturization) trade-off is often reflected in the total power output of the system, where a smaller one may indicate a smaller effective range and need to be closer," he explained. However, in drone-to-drone scenarios, such as DroneHunter or similar systems, the tradeoff of electronic warfare payloads may be acceptable, since the engagement takes place at close range anyway.

According to a now public DHS assessment, small gps blocker, particularly "personal privacy devices" readily available on the Internet, pose one of the greatest risks to the nation's critical infrastructure.

Homeland Security report details privacy signal jammers risks

According to researchers at the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) Infrastructure Threat and Risk Analysis Center (HITRAC), these devices, also known as PPDS, are among the three most likely causes of GPS outages. However, of these three scenarios, only the one involving multiple PPDS is considered the most likely to occur and the most likely to cause harm to industrial infrastructure operations.

The study authors evaluated the impact of different types of GPS interference after examining their possibilities. The more likely a certain type of disruption is to occur, the greater its potential impact, and the higher its overall risk.

To better understand what would happen if GPS signals were weakened or disrupted, the Department of Homeland Security took a closer look at how to integrate GPS into four of the 16 infrastructure sectors the agency considers critical to the nation. These four sectors - communications, emergency services, transportation (all types), and energy - were chosen because GPS PNTS are used to support or accomplish their core mission.

While the operations of all four sectors could be severely disrupted by at least two of the eight scenarios, scenario D - a scenario containing two or more personal privacy devices - is the only one of the eight that has a high impact on each sector.

Transport. The transport sector is analysed in air and ground/sea modes. Most experts agree that for the aviation industry, the effects of PPD are likely to be viewed as isolated incidents of GPS signal attenuation, with problems lasting more than a month. However, that would be a hassle and a capacity issue because the nation's air traffic control system has multiple layers of redundancy.

Energy. The energy sector "relies on GPS to provide power system reliability and grid efficiency, to synchronize services between power networks, and to detect faults within transmission networks," the researchers said. GPS is a key component of wide area distribution monitoring system, phase monitoring unit and disturbance monitoring equipment.

The operator uses a phasor measurement unit (PMU) that relies on precise, universal timing information in the GPS signal to achieve extremely accurate time stamps that are related to sampled voltage and current inputs. "Collecting and collating these measurements provides a powerful technique for monitoring and modeling power networks," the authors explain.

Communication. There are many types of communications infrastructure, including wireless, wired, satellite, and broadcast, that use timing signals from GPS constrained oscillators (GPSdos), clocks that maintain their accuracy by constantly referencing GPS time sources.

But communications companies have long factored in national disasters and unexpected outages, so they are usually prepared to deal with problems. If the timing system loses its lock on the GPS signal, it goes into hold mode, relying on its internal clock to slow down the decline in timing accuracy. The duration and performance level of the system depends on the quality of the non-GPS timing source.

Emergency services. Emergency services appear to be the sector most vulnerable to short-term GPS outages. First responders use GPS to navigate to the incident and, like the entire communications sector, they stay in touch with each other through a network that often relies on GPS-regulated oscillators.

"If the architecture of first responders' radio networks is centered around GPS timing, there is no ready backup when the GPS component is compromised," the DHS report said. "While dispatchers will still be able to communicate with the various emergency units, there may be disruptive effects on radio signals or untimely delays in communication voice radio systems using simulcast technology."

Without GPS, E911 service would also suffer and computer-aided dispatch systems would be hampered, making it more difficult to locate accident and stolen vehicles and dispatch fire, medical, and police. "While the department has not yet reached the point of complete reliance on GPS services, the use of GPS improves the department's ability to mitigate damage and assist in timely rescue responses," the researchers wrote.

As an ideal anti-espionage device, signal jammer is becoming more and more popular nowadays. Many people consider spying or surveillance to be far removed from their daily lives. Unfortunately, this is not the case. Today we show you the dark world with a story from Mexico. Then you'll see why self-protection signal jammer device are necessary.

Mexico story

According to local portals, 12 Mexican states and the country's military have purchased state-of-the-art software that can be used to spy on citizens' computers and mobile phones, but it is worth noting that there is no judicial guarantee for any justice of the peace to carry out such a task.

The software obtained can infect any citizen's phone and computer to steal their information without legal guarantees for such surveillance, nor is there any evidence that the software has been used illegally.

Another important detail is that there have only been two reports of judicial interference with phone requests in recent years, one in 2014 and the other in 2015. This indicates that the government agency that obtained the software is using it illegally without any legal authorization. Some states have reported requests for intervention without legal recognition, which is unreasonable given the high cost of buying the software.

Protecting yourself is a priority

No one wants to be bugged, followed or watched. But you're the only one responsible for your safety. Signal jammers are our best weapon against all of this. With the ability to cell phone jammer, wireless networks, and even GPS signals, you will ensure that no one can steal any of your data or information.

How to deal with illegal GPS location?

Today, GPS tracking is common in many areas. Both objects and people are connected to GPS transmitters so that their location can be determined at any time. This technique is especially useful during leisure time. Everyone knows this feature when using navigation systems or tracking movement units. What is less well known is that many moving objects can be fitted with tracking devices. Two common uses are that the front door key is always misplaced or the bike can be stolen.

While this type of GPS tracking is done intentionally, the technology can also be used without permission. Illegal tracking devices on cars used for surveillance purposes are particularly common. Once it is suspected that your vehicle is being tracked in this way, it will help if you act quickly.

What is the use of GPS tracking in a car?

GPS tracking in car traffic has made great strides in recent decades. Whether it's through a permanently installed navigation system or a smartphone, finding your way around is made easier with the help of GPS. Turn on the power, enter the address, and let it guide you to your destination - so simple and effective. GPS tracking technology is also used to prevent theft, especially in expensive, high-quality cars. The vehicle can be located at any time by GPS signal via a small transmitter.

If someone wanted to find these GPS trackers in a car, it would be an almost impossible task. As long as GPS is being used for legitimate self-interest, the technology is a blessing. From the moment of covert surveillance, a vast illegal gray area emerges.

Find a GPS jammer

GPS jammers are all you need for anti-tracking. It will block GPS signals to ensure that no data is transmitted from your smartphone to the satellite.

You need to know which GPS signal bands you want to block, there are L1 to L5 GPS frequencies, but with perfectjammer's state-of-the-art signal jammer, you can block all of these bands with one device. Other available options include desktop, portable and their coverage.

More and more drones are being used in different fields to support individuals and companies in a variety of tasks. These include filming sports games, filming weddings and inspecting farmers' harvests. Drones also provide support to the official sector, such as identifying situations after disasters or in the event of accidents and fires.

It is estimated that there are currently 800,000 and 1.5 million drones in the United States. Because there is no central record of drones, and crashes and defects are not recorded, it is difficult to estimate their exact number. As a result, domestic sales numbers cannot be corrected for the contraction.

What can I do about drones?

Many citizens are annoyed by their neighbors' drones, feeling they are being watched in their gardens or terraces. It also needs to be clarified, for example, what will happen to a photo taken by a neighbor with a drone of another property and the people on it. This can significantly reduce the quality of life and lead to psychological problems. So it's a no-brainer to consider shooting down drones. However, private individuals are not allowed to do so, which also makes sense given the context of uncontrollable crashes.

Only military and police forces can shoot down drones with different means, and their drone jammer can kill drones from a great distance from the ground. In addition, experiments are currently being conducted with eagles and trained to intercept drones. Whether police will use those tools, however, remains to be determined. To prevent harm. Only private individuals are allowed to capture drones to prevent out-of-control crashes. Private interference with drone signals is also prohibited. If you are disturbed by a neighbor's drone, you can call the police to clarify the matter accordingly.

Currently, security companies are no exception, as only national authorities and institutions can take active action against drones. A relaxation of this rule is being considered as it would be difficult to ensure the safety of thousands of football fans or concertgoers, especially at major events, without allowing private security companies to take countermeasures against drones.

Great Independence Day Sale! ! !

10% discount on our website right now.

Stack discount codes to get at least 20% off!

Maybe after two days the activity will disappear.

If you need, you can contact us to place an order.

Date: July 1st to July 7th

A quick and dirty guide to cell phone surveillance during protests

As an uprising of police brutality and institutionalized racism swept the country, many faced the full force of law enforcement weapons and surveillance for the first time. Whenever protesters, phones and police are in the same place, protesters should be concerned about cell phone surveillance. Often, security practitioners or other protesters will advise local law enforcement to respond to such concerns by using cell site simulators (also known as CSS, IMSI receivers, Stingray, Dirtbox, Hailstorm, Fake Station Base, or Crossbow). But a lot of times

The bottom line: There is little concrete evidence that the United States is using cellphone simulators against protesters. The threat of mobile phone simulators should not deter activists from voicing dissent or using mobile phones. On the other hand, since more than 85 local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies across the country have some type of CSS(some of which are used hundreds of times a year), it's not unreasonable to include cellular sites if you're going to participate in protests and take a few simple steps to protect yourself, include simulators in your security plan.

Locating a specific mobile device (and its owner) is rumored to be the most common use for cell site simulators by law enforcement, but conversely, it may be the least useful in the event of an incident. Locating specific people during protests is of little use because police can usually already see where everyone is using helicopters and other visual surveillance methods. However, in some cases, police may want to use CSS to discreetly track protesters instead of using on-site teams or helicopters.

Denial of service or signal jamming is an additional feature of CSS. In fact, the FBI has admitted that CSS can interfere with people's signals in the area. Unfortunately, for the same reason, it's hard to detect CSS usage and how often they intentionally or unintentionally interrupt services. What appears to be signal interference can also be overloading of cell towers and loss of connection. When many people suddenly gather in one place, the network can become overloaded with more traffic than it was designed for.

How does a drone RF jammer work?

There are a number of technologies in development aimed at preventing dangerous drones from entering no-fly zones or harming civilians. Among them, radio frequency (RF) jamming, or jammers, can be used to disrupt the RF signal of the drone, thus causing it to be disabled.

Rf jammers are designed to disrupt drones or drones by emitting RF electromagnetic noise, which drones use to operate and transmit video at levels high enough to disrupt any effective communication between the system and its pilot. Reference number

Typically, this RF interference occurs at 2.4GHz or 5.8GHz, which are public "unassigned" frequencies. Using these frequencies, wifi blocker do not interfere with manned aircraft, mobile communications, public broadcasting, or other dedicated radio bands.

Jammers can be effective against drones from miles away. Most RF jammers work by the ratio of the distance between the drone and the jammer to the distance between the drone and its pilot. In general, the farther the drone is from the pilot and the closer it is to the jammer, the better. The typical effective orientation of a jammer is a cone of about 15-30 degrees, protruding forward from the muzzle (this is also affected by the RF band and power of the jammer).

In addition to RF interference, GPS interference can also be used, as a large number of drones rely on GPS to balance the wind direction or navigate between predetermined points.

When a drone is intercepted by a signal from an RF uav jammer, the system typically returns to its origin (unless the GPS is also interfered with), allowing the user to track the drone.

Aircraft are especially vulnerable when GPS stops working. In addition to making navigation more difficult, systems that warn of the danger of colliding with other aircraft stopped working.

- We find that other authorities take the problem somewhat seriously, but are a little confused when it comes to solving it. Captain Aleksander Wasland of Vidler Island said it was very good news that the armed forces were interested and that there was also interest in civil aviation.

He himself was trapped twice.

"What really bothers us is that when the GPS is blocked, we have several systems that don't work, and that's a problem for flight safety," Vaslan said.

There is still some work to be done before the notification system can work. The signals picked up by the satellite this weekend will now be analyzed in the United States.

This is very exciting work, but it's too early to tell if the satellite successfully picked up the cell phone jamming signal we sent over the weekend. 'We'll know in the future,' Mr. Candola said.

Currently, there are only three satellites in the system, operated by the American company Hawkeye 360. Not enough to make an early warning system work optimally.

The three satellites are in polar orbits around the Earth, and they don't cover the entire planet at once. But the company plans to launch more satellites and then we will get better and more continuous coverage of Norway, "Kandola said.

Great Independence Day Sale! ! !

10% discount on our website right now.

Stack discount codes to get at least 20% off!

Maybe after two days the activity will disappear.

If you need, you can contact us to place an order.

Date: July 1st to July 7th

Great Independence Day Sale! ! !

10% discount on our website right now.

Stack discount codes to get at least 20% off!

Maybe after two days the activity will disappear.

If you need, you can contact us to place an order.

Date: July 1st to July 7th

Nissan is building signal jammers in its cars to eliminate cell phone interference

A car manufacturer has developed a compartment that blocks cell phone signals.

Nissan says the Signal Shield prototype, built into the armrest of the Juke crossover, will eliminate distractions from incoming calls, messages and social media notifications.

The box works on the principle of a Faraday cage (invented in the 1830s), which uses materials such as wire mesh to shield its contents from electromagnetic fields.

Once the lid is closed, all mobile, Bluetooth and Wi-Fi signals cannot reach the inside of the compartment.

The RAC survey of more than 1,700 UK motorists found that the proportion admitting to using a mobile phone while driving rose from 8% in 2014 to 31% last year.

In October, lorry driver Tomasz Kroker was jailed for 10 years after crashing a stationary car with his car while playing with his mobile phone on the A34 near Newbury, Berkshire, killing a woman and three children.

According to the UK's Department for Transport, 22 people were killed and 99 seriously injured in crashes on UK roads in 2015, in which drivers using mobile phones played a role.

RAC road safety spokesman Pete Williams said: "Our research shows that mobile phone use by drivers has reached epidemic proportions.

"With mobile phone technology advancing by leaps and bounds, many people have become addicted to it. However, using a mobile phone while driving is a physical and mental distraction and has been illegal since 2003.

"cell phone jammer is a great example of technology that can help drivers make smart phone calls.

"For those who can't avoid the temptation, this simple but smart enough technology offers them a valuable no-movement zone."

WiFi Cancellation Verification VS WiFi Jammer: What's the difference?

Terminology can sometimes confuse all of us. [Seytonic] does a good job of explaining the difference between a WiFi jammer and a cancellation validator in the video embedded below. Many of you already know the difference, but it's worth pointing it out because many refer to de-authenticating devices as "wifi blocker."

In their YouTube video, they explain that jammers emit a noise load on all WiFi channels, resulting in unusable frequencies within a given distance from the jammer. Jammers are also usually quite expensive and mostly illegal, making them hard to find unless you make your own.

WiFi de-validation, on the other hand, works in a very different way. WiFi sends unencrypted packets, called management frames. Because these are not encrypted, even if the network uses WPA2, a malicious party can send a de-authentication command to direct the user out of the access point. However, there is hope for 802.11w with encrypted management frames. It's been around for a while, but manufacturers don't seem willing to implement it, even though it could make WiFi devices more secure against such attacks.

Disassemble what you shouldn't have - GPS jammers

GPS jammers are easily available on the Internet. No, we won't link to them. However, truck drivers and others who own company cars often use GPS jammers, and they don't want their employers tracking their every move. Are these devices useful? Is it worth paying $25 for one?

These tiny individual boxes emit radio frequency of about 1575.42 MHz, the same frequency used by GPS satellites in high Earth orbit. These signals from GPS satellites are very, very weak and are relatively easily drowned out by noise. This is pretty much the block diagram for those cheap GPS jammers: Put the noise at the right frequency, and your phone or your boss's GPS tracker won't work. Note that this is a very low-tech attack; In theory, more sophisticated GPS jamming and spoofing techniques could allow drones to land safely.

The dismantling of the GPS jammer shows that the device is very simple. There are some 555s making low frequency noise. This provides the VCO with a signal in the 1466 to 1590 MHz range. The output of the VCO is then sent to a large RF transistor for amplification and output via a quarter-wave antenna. It may be RF magic, but it's a very simple circuit.

The output of this circuit was measured and, to the surprise of many, there were no stray emissions or harmonics - the jammer would not disable your phone or WiFi, only your GPS. The range of the device in the open air is estimated at 15-30 meters, which is more than enough if you're a truck driver. In a canyon of skyscrapers, this range can extend to hundreds of meters.

The missionary pleaded guilty in the drug conspiracy case

The third person pleaded guilty in drug conspiracy cases involving cocaine and carjacking.

Daniel Herrera Bell admitted on Thursday the carjacking charges related to the case.

According to the indictment against 38 year old Herrera Bear and four other individuals from Mission, they include Emily Julieta Gonzalez, 23, from Edinburgh, Jorge Alberto De Leon, 27, from Mission, Ruben Artemio Villarreal Jr., and Israel Hernandez; Age and last place of residence are not listed - the gang is plotting to import over 5 kilograms of cocaine from Mexico.

After an incident in March, these five men participated in the conspiracy when 9 kilograms of cocaine were found in Uncle Gonzalez's Chevrolet Trailblazer car.

CI told the authorities that De Leon was riding a Volkswagen Beetle car used in the carjacking, while Ereira Bell was the mastermind behind the carjacking plan, and provided information about Gonzalez's pioneer car and the drugs in the car.

Federal agents finally executed a Search warrant on the homes of Herrera Bell and De Leon, and collected evidence of their communication on the carjacking incident.

When searching De Leon's phone, the police also discovered conversations with other people's WhatsApp, including a contact registered as "Chamoy", who was identified as (Ellera Bear) based on the known phone number used by Ellera Bear. When reviewing WhatsApp conversations, the police discovered an audio message with Herrera Bear on April 19, 2020, discussing the purchase of a cell phone jammer that can be used to block GPS signals or the transmission of mobile phones

De Leon's mobile phone also contains screenshots or photos of Hidalgo (the police station) and McAllen's office (the Homeland security Bureau of Investigation), where the tracker is said to be located at that time.

The court documents stated: "Officials also found screenshots of the" Monitor "news report on De Leon's phone, detailing the federal arrest of Gonzalez

According to the location of the cellular base stations found on their respective phones, De Leon and Herrera Bell are located near the car hijacking incident and the abandoned vehicle, respectively.

According to the indictment later edited, Villarreal and Hernandez were suspected of participating in the initial carjacking incident.

On September 23rd, Gonzalez and De Leon each admitted a charge related to a drug conspiracy. The records show that they will accept the verdict on December 16th. Villarreal and Hernandez are both tough guys, and they are preparing for preliminary hearing in the near future.

In addition, the records show that Herrera Bell will be in the United States District Judge Micae on December 16

KOTA KINABALU: Les propriétaires de drones et les passionnés de Sabah doivent obtenir un permis pour piloter l'appareil, a déclaré le commandant de l'unité de l'escadre aérienne de la police (PGU) à Sabah, ACP Ahmad Lokman Abd Hadi.

Il a déclaré qu'ils étaient tenus d'obtenir l'approbation du Département malaisien des enquêtes et de la cartographie, ainsi que d'obtenir le permis de l'Autorité de l'aviation civile de Malaisie (CAAM) avant que l'appareil puisse être piloté, mais uniquement dans l'espace spécifié.

«À Sabah, il y a des activités de vol de drones, mais c'est plus un passe-temps et PGU le surveille pour tout signalement d'empiètement dans des zones restreintes.

Faire voler des drones sans permis est une infraction au règlement de l'aviation civile malaisienne (MCAR) 2016.

Ahmad Lokman a déclaré qu'à la suite d'informations faisant état de vols non autorisés de drones, le PGU avait été doté d'un dispositif drone jammer pour désactiver les personnes aperçues volant dans des zones interdites.

Les zones interdites comprennent la zone Sabah PGU, a-t-il dit, ajoutant que l'unité avait été équipée de quatre types de drones, à savoir Dji Phantom 3 Professional; Dji Inspire 1; Dji Mavic 2 Enterprise Zoom et Dji Mavic 2 Enterprise Dual et un Orion 7 MP Jammer.-Bernama

InfiniDome receives $1.6 million in investment to protect your GPS from hacker attacks

As vehicles increasingly rely on GPS connectivity systems, a simple GPS jammers purchased by a store may disrupt your next highway cruise, which seems quite frightening. Don't worry, InfiniDome has developed a simple and effective solution to keep your GPS on track

InfiniDome is an Israeli startup aimed at protecting GPS connected vehicles from interference and grassroots deception attacks. This cybersecurity company must be aware of its financial potential as it has just announced the launch of a pre A round of financing, even though it has just completed a $1.6 million seed round financing led by Israel's Next Gear Ventures, Boundary Holding, and Aston Partners in New York.

In a conversation with Geektime's co founder and CEO, Omer Sharar explained that they implemented the same electronic warfare principles within the company, which were previously strictly reserved for military companies. We don't use a single antenna, but several antennas. This, combined with proprietary electronic devices and algorithms, enables the system to identify which vector the vehicle is being attacked by and combine it with the received pattern, which can weaken the signal of the signal jammers. Sharar compares InfiniDome's technology to noise cancelling headphones, saying, "When listening to regular headphones, loud noise can easily drown out the music Although headphones with Active noise control function can reduce external noise, so you can enjoy music. This is very similar to the functionality provided by our product - weakening the hacker's interference signal and allowing the GPS system to continuously connect to satellites

GPS and location-based services may be among the most important recent technological advances, but they can also put privacy at risk.

GPS not only facilitates navigation from point A to point B, but also provides a reliable and accurate source for synchronizing time and infrastructure, including within the power grid.

GPS relies on a "constellation" of 24 major satellites orbiting the Earth to determine a target's longitude, latitude, speed and heading. GPS tracking was developed during the Cold War and has come a long way since its invention. Today, the technology is widely used in smartphones and mobile devices and is considered invaluable to first responders and military personnel, businesses and individuals.

GPS can save lives in disaster relief, search and rescue, and traffic and airspace accident prevention. It drives economic productivity around the world, particularly in the areas of delivery, construction, weather and agriculture. Last but not least, GPS has been an essential part of national security since its introduction during the Cold War.

The reliability and free nature of GPS has allowed the development of thousands of applications that can be used in many aspects of a user's life. Given the ubiquity of technology around the world that uses GPS to coordinate location and time, it's easy to imagine the hypothetical confusion that could result from an attack on GPS frequencies. Follow the GPS Infrastructure Risk Summary to understand how important GPS security is to your business.

If you haven't heard the terms "jamming" and "spoofing" related to trucking telematics before, you're not alone, as both are very rare forms of telematics hacking in the United States.

Still, Guy Busnell, product manager for Spiren Communications' Location and Navigation business unit, warned that such activity is already happening in overseas freight markets and could eventually spread to the United States.

"GPS jamming is now common, jamming equipment is readily available and very cheap," he told fleet owners. "We know that criminals are starting to use signal jammers to commit crimes. In Italy, for example, criminal gangs target scrap metal shipments. They hijack a truck, force the driver to stop, take him captive, and then use GPS jammers so they can't track the cargo as they drive away."

One of the more "insidious" effects of GPS jamming, according to Buesnel's estimation, is that when the cell phone jammer is near the receiver, the receiver can start sending out dangerously misleading information, such as incorrect information about location and time.

"Without understanding how the receiver behaves in the face of jamming and spoofing attacks, you take a big risk by trusting the data it generates," he explained.

According to a 2015 Business Risk survey conducted by insurance broker The Graham Company, cybersecurity is also becoming a greater concern for the U.S. business community.

The firm surveyed 300 senior professionals in the United States and found that cybersecurity ranked highest among "business risks," with 21 percent of respondents ranking it as the number one threat they were most concerned about.

The survey also revealed that nearly half of respondents felt cyber risk was "serious" in the following situations:

A hacking incident resulted in the theft of customer information

The organization's network cannot be used

Theft of personal employee information

Intellectual property theft

The organization's website cannot be accessed

GPS interference is separate from identity theft. GPS jammers are typically small devices that emit strong radio signals that drown out weaker signals from GPS or other sources. Once the device is turned on, the location of a person or entity is quickly masked. Not only do cheap GPS jammers cause problems for law enforcement (and are often illegal), but they also raise concerns because they could disrupt the transportation industry and any other business that relies on GPS tracking.

A well-publicized example of the potential harm of wifi jammers made headlines when Newark Airport in New Jersey was effectively shut down after jammers inside company vehicles interfered with signal fires.

Network tracking. Cyberbullying occurs when someone uses technology to target or harass a victim online. Hacking into devices to track an individual's location and activities without their consent is an example of cyberbullying. This is often done by installing monitoring apps on mobile devices to track locations without the user's knowledge.

Location-based services. Location-based services (LBS) are software applications accessed from a mobile device that require information about the device's location. Some LBS are query-based, providing answers to user questions such as "Where is the nearest gas station?" Others are defined by a push notification model that distributes marketing materials such as coupons and special offers from area businesses or attractions. LBS is required by law to obtain user permission to track location. Once accepted, the application uses GPS to locate and track the whereabouts of the end user.

The U.S. military is testing a wide-area GPS jammers that could disable GPS satellite navigation signals from California into Mexico from the Oregon border during testing.

The tests were conducted on six Tuesdays and Thursdays this month, from 9:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time on June 7, 9, 21, 23, 28 and 30 - has the potential to disrupt satellite navigation on commercial airliners flying to and from busy ports of entry on the West Coast, such as Los Angeles International Airport, and San Francisco.

During these times, commercial and general aviation aircraft may need to revert to older air navigation systems, including VHF and IF radio beacons that send signals to cockpit avionics known as VHF full range (VOR) indicators and automatic direction finding (ADF).

On six days this month, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) officials issued flight notices (NOTAM) to pilots warning of possible GPS interference on planes.

The FAA warned that the military tests, conducted at the China Lake Naval Air Warfare Center in the desert town of Ridgecrest, California, "may result in unreliable or unusable GPS signals."

During tests in areas including major airports in Los Angeles, San Francisco Bay, San Diego, Phoenix and Salt Lake City, the GPS signals of aircraft flying at an altitude of 25,000 feet could be interfered with or lost.

It is not just air navigation that is affected. Land vehicles, ships and surface vessels could degrade GPS capabilities within 235 nautical miles of China Lake, which includes the ports of Los Angeles, Oakland and San Diego.

Details about the military GPS jamming test are scarce, but it begs the question: What's worth eliminating GPS navigation in more than half of the West Coast's major metropolitan areas?

There is a very real threat that electronic warfare interference could disable large areas of satellite navigation. The potential impact of GPS interference is not yet widely known, but the more we rely on GPS, the more serious the threat becomes.

Twenty years ago, no one seriously thought about GPS. Today, it has become standard on all smartphones. I know a lot of drivers who can't live without it. Today, learning to use the old Rand McNally Road Atlas is no longer a priority.

This fall, amid suspicions that Russia is jamming GPS signals in Europe and elsewhere, the U.S. military will test an anti-jamming GPS in an attempt to solve the "breakout defense" problem.

GPS jammers could also become a major liability for the United States and its Allies, with systems that rely on them for everything from troop movement to missile and drone guidance. Last fall, the United States and NATO Allies launched a major joint exercise called Trident Junction in Norway to test the joint readiness and training of the large multinational alliance. During the exercise, the military noticed GPS signals were jammed, which Finnish and Norwegian officials blamed on Russia. In April 2018, U.S. officials said the Russian military had interfered with the GPS systems of its drones operating in Syria.

Members of the 2nd Cavalry Regiment in Germany will receive the jamming device this fall, and the military is reportedly looking to develop a new generation of inertial navigation systems that can be used as a backup.

The United States, Russia, China and other countries are developing new weapons to compromise other countries' satellite constellations. Anti-satellite weapons can not only degrade a military adversary's ability to operate on the battlefield, but also threaten civilian use in space. This makes it more difficult to identify a single perpetrator of an attack and could deal a serious blow to the military and economic power of space powers in both peace and war.

At the same time, Russia is investing in near-Earth anti-satellite capabilities, deploying satellite jamming systems to disrupt data flows between satellites and their customers on the ground. The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) noted that there have been multiple reports of GPS interference in and around Russia, as well as Russian forces in Syria. The outage of GPS makes it harder for pilots and homing weapons to quickly reference their position. Forms of interference include cell phone jamming GPS signals, preventing users from accessing data, spoofing locations, and secretly sending false location data.

China is also working to develop ground-based gsm jammer to disrupt satellite data transmissions, an important capability that could be used against long-range adversaries such as the United States.

Perhaps the most advanced anti-satellite weapons program of any country is run by the United States. The U.S. military has a powerful Arsenal of anti-satellite weapons, including ground-based interceptor missiles deployed in Alaska and Hawaii. The GBI was originally designed to shoot down ballistic missile warheads aimed at the United States through low-Earth orbit. The U.S. Navy's SM-3 interceptor missile has more experience in this regard, having shot down an aging satellite during Operation Frost Burn in 2008.

Unintentional interference from radio and space can cause problems for GPS systems, as can GPS interference and deliberate signal spoofing. But according to a 2012 Homeland Security report recently released under the Freedom of Information Act, communications companies are not ready to protect GPS systems from these threats, EE Publishing reports.

The communications industry is "vulnerable to a potential prolonged GPS outage" lasting a few days or more, which "could result in a reduction in service quality across the industry," the report said.

If you rely heavily on GPS, then your confidence is likely to be lost - and that's just to find a friend's home, restaurant, or the latest trendy bar.

Experts are beginning to study the resilience of global Positioning System (GPS) satellite navigation networks to the effects of intentional or unintentional electronic interference. The reaction was not very good.

Radio frequency and microwave experts at Crowley Bollen Communications in the UK have been studying electronic interference in GPS signals for a year and have come to some surprising conclusions.

"We have searched the world for GPS interference and found many incidents of interference, some of which were intentional," said Guy Buensel, PNT technology specialist at Spirent, a multinational telecommunications test and measurement company.

If the reliability of automotive GPS systems is questionable, what are the implications for commercial air traffic control, radar systems, intelligent munitions guidance, or fleet management of trucks and cargo ships?

After a year of GPS testing, Spiellen concluded that satellite navigation signals are subject to a variety of disturbances that can damage, weaken or eliminate GPS signals during one-time temporary events.

These temporary GPS outages can cause more problems than meets the eye. The reason for this is that ground-based GPS users rely as much on timing services as they do on location information. GPS satellites are equipped with precise atomic clocks that provide unprecedented timing accuracy.

With the development of technology, many people can not live without mobile phones, but mobile phones can easily leak our personal information and listen to calls. In both business and military, mobile phones can be used as illegal eavesdropping devices, spy mobile phones can steal sensitive information in many important places, and it is extremely hidden. If you're worried about tracking GSM numbers, our GSM jammers are the perfect solution to these problems. It blocks all overwritten calls and protects your privacy. The use of GSM alarm jammers Driven by the Internet, this situation is becoming more and more common, and it is easy to buy gsm jammer. It blocks any alarms that are connected through GSM.

What is GSM interference?

GSM is the most widely used frequency range in cellular telephone networks and mobile communications. It includes four major bands (850 MHz, 900 MHz, 1800 MHz, 1900 MHz) and many smaller standards used in different countries around the world (e.g. UMTS, CDMA2000, Nextel, TDMA, AMPS, W-CDMA PCS, etc.). .

As the name suggests, GSM jammers can interfere with the airwaves transmitted and received by a cell phone jammer, thus disrupting the phone operator's frequencies and thus blocking communications. GSM jammers or GSM jammers block only the GSM band. Radio communication of the plant and its components is not affected as it passes through the 433 and/or 868Mhz bands. As a result, thieves use GSM jammers to prevent alerts from being sent over the phone.

GSM gps jammer work by simply emitting noise over a frequency band, which prevents the phone from distinguishing that noise from valid data.

How to implement GSM shielding?

Although different cellular systems handle a variety of different signals, all networks use basic radio signals in ways that can easily be interrupted. GSM2 is a system for digital cellular as well as PC-based systems, operating in the 900 MHz and 1800 MHz bands in Asia or Europe and the 1900 MHz bands in the North. America.

Jammer device are capable of successfully broadcasting any type of frequency, effective against CDMA, AMPS, GSM, TDMA, DCS, PCS, Nextel and even iDEN systems. "Old" analog phones as well as today's digital devices are prone to crashes.

GSM anti-jamming

Hide alarm centers and transmitters and avoid seeing them. If there is no alarm device location information, GSM jamming strategy will be difficult to implement.

Establish a dual alarm protocol if the GSM alarm device is interfered with, the program sets the system to automatically switch to a landline telephone (PSTN) or send alarms over the Internet (IP).

Bluetooth is a similar radio wave technology, but it is primarily designed to communicate over short distances of less than 10m or 30ft. In general, you can use it to download photos from your digital camera to your PC, connect a wireless mouse to your laptop, and connect a hands-free headset to your phone so that you can talk and drive safely at the same time, as well as soon. Electronic devices that work in this way have built-in radio antennas (transmitters and receivers), so they can simultaneously send and receive signals wirelessly to other Bluetooth devices. Older gadgets can be converted to support Bluetooth using plug-in adapters (in the form of USB sticks, PCMCIA laptop cards, etc.). Transmitter power determines the range in which Bluetooth devices can operate, and devices generally fall into one of three categories: Class 1 is the strongest, which can operate up to 100m(330 ft), Class 2 (the most common type) is effective up to 10 m(33 ft), and Class 3 is the weakest, which does not exceed 1 m(3.3 ft).

How does Bluetooth work?

Bluetooth sends and receives radio waves in a band of 79 different frequencies (channels) centered around 2.45 GHz, separate from radio, television and mobile phones, reserved for industrial, scientific and medical use. Don't worry: your use of Bluetooth at home won't interfere with someone's survival machine, because the low power of the transmitter won't carry your signal that far! One of its biggest advantages is the short-range transmitter of Bluetooth. They use little to no power, and since they don't transmit great distances, they are theoretically more secure than wireless networks that work long distances, such as Wi-Fi (in practice, there are security concerns.)

Bluetooth devices automatically detect and connect to each other and can communicate with up to eight devices simultaneously. They don't interfere with each other because each pair of devices uses a different channel out of 79 available channels. If two devices want to talk, they randomly choose a channel and, if that channel is already occupied, randomly switch to one of the other channels (a technique called spread spectrum hopping). In order to minimize the risk of interference from other electrical equipment (and also to improve safety), pairs of devices are constantly changing the frequencies they are using, thousands of times per second.

When two or more Bluetooth devices share information, they form a temporary mini-network of computers called a piconet. Other devices can join or leave the existing Piconet at any time. One device (called the master device) acts as the overall network controller, while other devices (called the slave device) follow its instructions. Two or more separate piconets can also connect and share information, forming what is known as a decentralized network.

Is Bluetooth better or worse than Wi-Fi?

People are often confused about Bluetooth and Wi-Fi because at first glance they seem to do similar things. In fact, they are quite different. Bluetooth is primarily used to temporarily connect computers and electronic devices over very short distances, and is often used for brief or occasional communications using relatively small amounts of data. It's relatively safe, uses very little power, and connects automatically. Wi-Fi is designed to transfer large amounts of data between computers and the Internet, often over much greater distances. It can involve more complex security and typically uses higher power. Bluetooth and Wi-Fi are complementary technologies,