By comparing these two devices side by side, M 27 and M25 are almost identical. From the installation bracket, CPU, wiring, and interference head, M-27 is no different from its brother. Blinder is ready to use out of the box, including all necessary wiring, external speakers, CPU, and two GPS shielding heads.

Overall, the M27 is a high-quality and high-performance wifi blocker

M27 is suitable for small vehicles with a smaller appearance. M47 is used to cover weak points of small vehicles or protect large trucks or SUVs.

Installation is almost effortless. By becoming slightly familiar with automotive electronic devices, amateur installers can easily connect the device. All you need is a power supply and a ground wire. It is easy to wire the signal jammers head through a firewall through telephone type connectors, which are small enough to pass through the smallest hole. Then the rest is to install the GPS interceptor head. This is where it's a bit difficult.

The installation brackets are independent of each other, which means that each side of the jammer head is supported by separate brackets. For normal operation, the jammer head needs to be completely straight and level with the road surface. This means that in order to install the pan tilt correctly, you must find 2 independent and completely horizontal surfaces on the car. If installed on the top of the bumper, this may be easy, but most people do not want to clumsily place two large cell phone jammer heads at the front of the vehicle. It is difficult to complete the correct head installation on many vehicles, which is why most Lens hood users create their own mounting brackets.

Once the head is installed correctly, M27 has made significant improvements compared to the old version. With a more powerful head and fully upgradeable CPU, this new device is ready for all new laser Radar speed gun developed. In most cases, this device will interfere with the LiDAR all the way to the muzzle. However, Blinder did encounter some interference issues.

For certain guns, such as the Ultralyte LR-B, occasional malfunctions may occur. Independent testing has shown that vehicles equipped with two gps jammer heads at the front of the vehicle cannot cover high reflective areas such as headlights. This is a particularly undesirable situation, as police officers are often trained to aim their headlights when they are unable to produce instant and fast readings. To solve this problem, a headlight laser protective cover may be needed. Laser veil is a liquid coating applied to headlights. Applying this technology to the headlights will greatly help Blinder achieve better interference effects.

Another solution is Blinder M47. This is the M27 with two additional interference heads. If users encounter interference when using the M27, two additional heads are very suitable for achieving better results. Two additional jamming heads will enable the vehicle to be bulletproof against most laser Radar speed gun in almost all cases.

Until recently, satellite navigation system outages in populated areas were a rare and sometimes sensational phenomenon that caught everyone's attention on social media and the news. Yet such incidents seem to be becoming the daily norm. With the invasion of the Kremlin region on the night of May 3, the era of "GPS failure" suddenly began (in every sense of the word). The public immediately blamed this on the machinations of "Bandra".

Drivers in central Moscow learn to fool GPS jammers

Then there were problems with car navigation and car-sharing services in the city centre. Russian intelligence quickly deployed "phone jammer" to jam GPS/GLONASS signals in the area, effectively jamming the guidance systems of any drone that tried to replicate its early May night adventure. Now, if you rely solely on your smartphone's navigation system, you might mistakenly think that a person is somewhere on the outskirts of Moscow.

The situation is expected to worsen as the Russian government is seriously considering giving large private and public companies the legal right to use electronic warfare systems to protect their facilities from drone attacks.

This means that in the near future, navigation "failures" related to satellite signal outages will be observed near important targets such as oil refineries, power plants, defense enterprises and other strategic targets. Of course, beating an industrial-grade electronic warfare station with a traditional smartphone is unlikely.

However, there are opportunities to mitigate the negative effects on personal navigation. We clarify that this is quite feasible in a noisy metropolis. In small, sparsely populated areas, this may not be necessary, as disorientation is generally less important.

However, in a large city affected buy jammers, motorists must find alternative "coordinate systems" for their navigation devices. Fortunately, this possibility already exists. Location-based services (LBS) technology has been around for a long time, allowing you to determine a user's geographic location based on signals from cell towers and Wi-Fi routers at known locations.

In order to eliminate interference when the coordinates are accurately determined, the user must manually turn off the reception of the GPS signal and activate the LBS function in their gadget (if not already enabled). While LBS can't provide the same accuracy as GPS/GLONASS signals in more landmarked urban environments, it can certainly help users get to their destination.

Russian electronic warfare (EW) forces are effectively jamming the GPS signals of Western-supplied equipment for the Ukrainian Armed Forces (AFU), often even equipment previously considered invulnerable. This is written by the British edition of The Economist.

The Economist declared that Western technology was effective in jamming radio frequency armed forces signals

"GPS is operated by the U.S. Space Force and is designed for the military. But the Russians routinely block the positioning systems installed on these weapons, sometimes even on models considered invulnerable, "the July 14 article said.

The authors explain that GPS satellites' radio signals are weak, which means the system's operation can easily be disrupted by competing noise. But according to a Pentagon report leaked this spring, which was cited by the publication, existing jamming filters do nothing to protect Western weapons in the special operations area.

It is important to note that there are multiple alternatives to GPS, but each has its drawbacks. It takes years to develop new guidance systems and upgrade existing weapons.

Earlier on July 7, former US intelligence official Scott Ritter said that the Russian armed forces were able to significantly reduce the effectiveness of the US HIMARS multiple rocket system (MLRS) supplied to Ukraine. He explained that air defense (air defense) and electronic warfare equipment can interfere with the GPS signal of the HIMARS missile, significantly reducing its accuracy. The same can be done with an ATACMS installation.

Earlier on July 6, Dmitry Rogozin, head of the Czar Wolves military Technical Center, said that the Russian military had removed almost the entire British Storm Shadow cruise missile from the line of contact. He said there was a GPS beacon inside the rocket, but it was blocked by the Russian armed forces. The projectile has been handed over to experts from the military-industrial Complex (OPK) to find an effective way to dispose of this weapon.

Earlier in the day, Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Lt. Gen. Igor Konashenkov said that Russian air defense systems shot down two Ukrainian Su-25 aircraft over the Donetsk People's Republic, intercepted four Storm Shadow missiles and four HIMARS multiple rocket shells, and hit the control center. Three Ukrainian brigades posts.

Russian President Vladimir Putin announced on February 24 last year the launch of a special operation to protect the Donbass, which continues. The decision was made against the backdrop of the worsening situation in the region due to shelling by the Ukrainian military.

Philadelphia (CBS) - What is a cell phone jammer? Why don't we all have one?

Dean Liptak, a Florida high school teacher turned professional wrestler, has had administrative and legal troubles recently. Imagine telling that person you forgot your science homework. Not for slapping a teen in desperate need of an attitude adjustment to the mat (although one can only imagine the fortitude it would take to not do it on a daily basis). Instead, he found a less aggressive but more illegal way to stop kids from checking their phones in class.

Liptak brings to schools cell phone jammer, radio frequency transmitters designed to block, jam or otherwise interfere with authorized radio communications. The device blocks cell phone signals and prevents teens from using their phones.

The problem is that it prevents everyone in the area from using their phones, including emergency responders. That's why you need to know that even though you can buy them on the Internet, federal law prohibits the marketing, sale, or use of jammers.

Mr Liptak is currently suspended without pay. He may need to find an easier job. Things like using pile drivers, choking bashes, and jumping brain damage to make a living.

A Florida teacher has been suspended for using signal jammers to prevent students from using their phones in class.

Teacher suspended for jamming mobile phone in classroom

Pasco County School Board members on Tuesday approved a five-day suspension without pay for Dean Liptak. Liptak did not dispute the decision.

Liptak activated the jammers in his Fivay High School classroom between March 31 and April 2, officials said. He later told school district investigators that he never intended to create a problem. He said he believed gps blocker were allowed as long as they were not done for malicious purposes.

Sheriff Kurt Browning wrote in a letter of reprimand that Liptak may have violated federal law by jamming signals that could interfere with others calling 911 in an emergency.

Washington - After considering how combat might be conducted in many different environments, the U.S. Army is changing its approach to long-range electronic warfare, signals intelligence and cyber systems.

The U.S. Army will customize long-range jammer device for the European and Indo-Pacific theater

The Land Layer System-Brigade and Above Echelon (TLS-EAB) is intended for use by larger Army formations, including divisions and armies with thousands of troops and extensive firepower. The system is considered a key part of the service's "depth awareness" strategy - the ability to identify, monitor, target and engage adversaries from longer distances with greater precision.

Mark Kitz, head of the Program Executive Office for Intelligence, Electronic Warfare and Sensors (PEO IEW&S), said the Army is "evolving our approach to acquisition," especially for flexibility. For example, the Indo-Pacific region, where the United States could come into conflict with China, and Europe, where the United States could come into conflict with Russia, have very different objectives and terrain.

"The Indo-Pacific Command looks very different from Africa, very different from anywhere," he said. "We can't just put together a cookie-cutter solution that barely works in that combatant command."

Defense officials consider China and Russia to be serious threats to national security. Both invest in military science and technology and are believed to be able to impede or defend against U.S. military communications, targeting, and attack.

The Army signed separate agreements with Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics Mission Systems in August for the TLS-EAB concept and demonstration. The first phase is valued at $15 million for 11 months. Lockheed and General Dynamics rank among the world's five largest defense contractors by revenue, according to Defense News analysis.

ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates - The CEO of Taiwanese company Tron Future says the system is ready for large-scale deployment, with production rates expected to reach 100 units per month by 2023. The company's anti-drone radar is already in use by the Taiwanese army. As demand increases.

​

Supplier says anti-drone radar ready for 'large-scale deployment' in Taiwan

Tron Future is only four years old, but its T.Radar Pro technology has already found a wide market in Taiwan, the Middle East and South Asia. The drones with the Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar can detect distances of up to 5 kilometers and weigh just 15 kilograms, which is what CEO Yujiu Wang said attracted customers the most.

"The radar was designed out of the need to build layered defenses in the air to protect Taiwan from the constant threat of different types of Chinese UAVs," Wang said in an interview at the IDEX arms show.

He explained that its development was guided by four principles: keeping it light and small; Equipped with 4D micro-Doppler function to distinguish multi-rotor drones and birds; Low cost; And performance against small, medium and low-altitude flying targets in urban environments.

The threat from Chinese drones has increased in recent years. In January 2023, a Chinese military magazine stressed that in the event of war in the Taiwan Strait, unmanned aerial systems would play a vital role in targeted strikes.

Wang said that at the height of the tensions, deployed radars detected as many as 100 Chinese drones conducting surveillance over Taiwan in one week. Key features of T.Radar Pro include an open architecture for image recognition applications, air traffic management, and interfaces for hard or soft kill countermeasures. It has a power consumption of 250 watts and a maximum signal bandwidth of 30 MHZ.

Initially, these radars were in service with the Taiwan Army and deployed over key islands, a challenging environment where the movement of waves in the ocean can create false targets.

Based on growing domestic and international demand, the company expects to produce 100 radars per month in the coming year and is considering opening a second production site in Taiwan. The T.Radar can be sold separately or as part of Tron Future's larger anti-drone system. The complete setup also includes a drone jammer and an interceptor, which the company's website describes as offering "a choice of explosive or non-destructive warheads to handle different situations." The company claims that the system together creates a defensive protective dome with a diameter of 5 kilometers.

Wang stressed that Taiwan's military does not want to be the first to attack in the face of China, as this could quickly escalate into an all-out war. The air defense platform is designed with this in mind, where each different system represents a logical chain that tries to avoid the use of hard kill countermeasures in the first place.

By Elisabeth Gosselin-Malo

Milan, Italy - Anti-drone weapons manufacturers say they are increasingly miniaturizing and simplifying their solutions to meet the growing demand for man-portable weapons as recent conflicts highlight the importance of mobile capabilities.

Portable counter-drone systems (C-UAS) have been around for some time, but their proliferation has accelerated in recent years amid the growing threat of weaponized commercial drones. In the 2019 C-UAS Database report compiled by Bard College's Center for Drone Research, 111 (21 percent) of the 537 market products analyzed were handheld solutions offered by more than 29 different countries.

Warren Brown, vice president of marketing at Fortem Technologies, explained that the purposes and ways in which these systems are used today have also changed over the past decade. "Historically, security details and protection for major events or critical infrastructure have been focused on fixed solutions. Recent conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine have shifted the focus to 'mobile' systems that offer advanced radar detection capabilities, ease of deployment and portability, low overall operating costs, and low cost per use, "he said. The belief that counter-drone systems measures must be large-scale to be effective also appears to have changed to some extent.

Previously, many militaries relied on more traditional jamming signal alternatives to counter enemy UAVs because they lacked access or resources to more appropriate and reliable systems. However, Brown said that relying on the deployment of legacy equipment is not always effective because they are not necessarily developed to address the comprehensive and evolving technology behind the drone threat.

"Traditional cell phone jamming solutions have a low success rate, forcing people to use expensive and impractical systems, such as large missile weapons, or even deploy fighter jets to try to mitigate the threat - which is often ineffective against small, maneuverable and hard-to-detect drones," he said. The recent failed attempt by South Korea to shoot down its neighbor's drone for several hours shows this.

Manufacturers have taken note of these issues, redesigning on top of existing technologies to more effectively address the dangers posed by drones, especially smaller ones that may be more difficult to deal with. In May 2022, Fortem Technology sent portable DroneHunters to Ukraine, saying in a press release that the company took an existing C-UAS system and further miniaturized and simplified it for use as an expeditionary rapid deployment weapon.

Matt McCrann, CEO of DroneShield, believes this illustrates where this type of technology is headed. "Of course, our goal is always to take a feature and make it easier to use, more efficient and more cost effective." Smaller, better, cheaper, "he said.

DroneShield's handheld countermeasures, such as DroneGuns, offer many advantages. As a small, lightweight system with easy-to-transport anti-drone system capabilities, it can be stored in a sling in a vehicle, backpack or body as the battlefield changes.

Powered by replaceable batteries, DroneGuns are non-kinetic and employ an electronic attack method, which means they can deliver unlimited "bullets" that are more economical than kinetic systems and can be operated more safely with minimal training.

In a similar way, other portable systems, such as Fortem's DroneHunters F700, offer countries a lower cost-per-use alternative than other higher-priced systems on the market. Brown pointed out that their weapons cost just a few hundred dollars per shot, which is much cheaper than high-energy systems such as electromagnetic pulse (laser) weapons, which also require a lot of power.

Another benefit of the Fortem system for suppressing UAVs is that the system can use cone-sleeve parachutes to shoot them down in a controlled manner, allowing reconnaissance and analysis of enemy systems and reducing collateral damage. This is in contrast to more traditional defense techniques, which can cause an enemy drone to explode or fall from the sky, often harming civilians and infrastructure in the process, or allowing it to return to its launch point without the need for potential research into its mission or location. It comes from.

Brown claims that in Fortem's more than 5,000 record captures, its solution has a 92% success rate. During the FIFA World Cup in Qatar, DroneHunters were further deployed to protect multiple stadiums. For DroneShield, McCrann said they are highly effective in both military and more traditional security environments, pointing to the recent example of using its DroneGun Tactical to neutralize four hovering drones during Brazil's presidential inauguration.

Despite the many advantages of these systems, MacLean warns that scaling down any given feature usually involves one or more trade-offs. "For electronic countermeasures, this (miniaturization) trade-off is often reflected in the total power output of the system, where a smaller one may indicate a smaller effective range and need to be closer," he explained. However, in drone-to-drone scenarios, such as DroneHunter or similar systems, the tradeoff of electronic warfare payloads may be acceptable, since the engagement takes place at close range anyway.

According to a now public DHS assessment, small gps blocker, particularly "personal privacy devices" readily available on the Internet, pose one of the greatest risks to the nation's critical infrastructure.

Homeland Security report details privacy signal jammers risks

According to researchers at the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) Infrastructure Threat and Risk Analysis Center (HITRAC), these devices, also known as PPDS, are among the three most likely causes of GPS outages. However, of these three scenarios, only the one involving multiple PPDS is considered the most likely to occur and the most likely to cause harm to industrial infrastructure operations.

The study authors evaluated the impact of different types of GPS interference after examining their possibilities. The more likely a certain type of disruption is to occur, the greater its potential impact, and the higher its overall risk.

To better understand what would happen if GPS signals were weakened or disrupted, the Department of Homeland Security took a closer look at how to integrate GPS into four of the 16 infrastructure sectors the agency considers critical to the nation. These four sectors - communications, emergency services, transportation (all types), and energy - were chosen because GPS PNTS are used to support or accomplish their core mission.

While the operations of all four sectors could be severely disrupted by at least two of the eight scenarios, scenario D - a scenario containing two or more personal privacy devices - is the only one of the eight that has a high impact on each sector.

Transport. The transport sector is analysed in air and ground/sea modes. Most experts agree that for the aviation industry, the effects of PPD are likely to be viewed as isolated incidents of GPS signal attenuation, with problems lasting more than a month. However, that would be a hassle and a capacity issue because the nation's air traffic control system has multiple layers of redundancy.

Energy. The energy sector "relies on GPS to provide power system reliability and grid efficiency, to synchronize services between power networks, and to detect faults within transmission networks," the researchers said. GPS is a key component of wide area distribution monitoring system, phase monitoring unit and disturbance monitoring equipment.

The operator uses a phasor measurement unit (PMU) that relies on precise, universal timing information in the GPS signal to achieve extremely accurate time stamps that are related to sampled voltage and current inputs. "Collecting and collating these measurements provides a powerful technique for monitoring and modeling power networks," the authors explain.

Communication. There are many types of communications infrastructure, including wireless, wired, satellite, and broadcast, that use timing signals from GPS constrained oscillators (GPSdos), clocks that maintain their accuracy by constantly referencing GPS time sources.

But communications companies have long factored in national disasters and unexpected outages, so they are usually prepared to deal with problems. If the timing system loses its lock on the GPS signal, it goes into hold mode, relying on its internal clock to slow down the decline in timing accuracy. The duration and performance level of the system depends on the quality of the non-GPS timing source.

Emergency services. Emergency services appear to be the sector most vulnerable to short-term GPS outages. First responders use GPS to navigate to the incident and, like the entire communications sector, they stay in touch with each other through a network that often relies on GPS-regulated oscillators.

"If the architecture of first responders' radio networks is centered around GPS timing, there is no ready backup when the GPS component is compromised," the DHS report said. "While dispatchers will still be able to communicate with the various emergency units, there may be disruptive effects on radio signals or untimely delays in communication voice radio systems using simulcast technology."

Without GPS, E911 service would also suffer and computer-aided dispatch systems would be hampered, making it more difficult to locate accident and stolen vehicles and dispatch fire, medical, and police. "While the department has not yet reached the point of complete reliance on GPS services, the use of GPS improves the department's ability to mitigate damage and assist in timely rescue responses," the researchers wrote.

As an ideal anti-espionage device, signal jammer is becoming more and more popular nowadays. Many people consider spying or surveillance to be far removed from their daily lives. Unfortunately, this is not the case. Today we show you the dark world with a story from Mexico. Then you'll see why self-protection signal jammer device are necessary.

Mexico story

According to local portals, 12 Mexican states and the country's military have purchased state-of-the-art software that can be used to spy on citizens' computers and mobile phones, but it is worth noting that there is no judicial guarantee for any justice of the peace to carry out such a task.

The software obtained can infect any citizen's phone and computer to steal their information without legal guarantees for such surveillance, nor is there any evidence that the software has been used illegally.

Another important detail is that there have only been two reports of judicial interference with phone requests in recent years, one in 2014 and the other in 2015. This indicates that the government agency that obtained the software is using it illegally without any legal authorization. Some states have reported requests for intervention without legal recognition, which is unreasonable given the high cost of buying the software.

Protecting yourself is a priority

No one wants to be bugged, followed or watched. But you're the only one responsible for your safety. Signal jammers are our best weapon against all of this. With the ability to cell phone jammer, wireless networks, and even GPS signals, you will ensure that no one can steal any of your data or information.

How to deal with illegal GPS location?

Today, GPS tracking is common in many areas. Both objects and people are connected to GPS transmitters so that their location can be determined at any time. This technique is especially useful during leisure time. Everyone knows this feature when using navigation systems or tracking movement units. What is less well known is that many moving objects can be fitted with tracking devices. Two common uses are that the front door key is always misplaced or the bike can be stolen.

While this type of GPS tracking is done intentionally, the technology can also be used without permission. Illegal tracking devices on cars used for surveillance purposes are particularly common. Once it is suspected that your vehicle is being tracked in this way, it will help if you act quickly.

What is the use of GPS tracking in a car?

GPS tracking in car traffic has made great strides in recent decades. Whether it's through a permanently installed navigation system or a smartphone, finding your way around is made easier with the help of GPS. Turn on the power, enter the address, and let it guide you to your destination - so simple and effective. GPS tracking technology is also used to prevent theft, especially in expensive, high-quality cars. The vehicle can be located at any time by GPS signal via a small transmitter.

If someone wanted to find these GPS trackers in a car, it would be an almost impossible task. As long as GPS is being used for legitimate self-interest, the technology is a blessing. From the moment of covert surveillance, a vast illegal gray area emerges.

Find a GPS jammer

GPS jammers are all you need for anti-tracking. It will block GPS signals to ensure that no data is transmitted from your smartphone to the satellite.

You need to know which GPS signal bands you want to block, there are L1 to L5 GPS frequencies, but with perfectjammer's state-of-the-art signal jammer, you can block all of these bands with one device. Other available options include desktop, portable and their coverage.

More and more drones are being used in different fields to support individuals and companies in a variety of tasks. These include filming sports games, filming weddings and inspecting farmers' harvests. Drones also provide support to the official sector, such as identifying situations after disasters or in the event of accidents and fires.

It is estimated that there are currently 800,000 and 1.5 million drones in the United States. Because there is no central record of drones, and crashes and defects are not recorded, it is difficult to estimate their exact number. As a result, domestic sales numbers cannot be corrected for the contraction.

What can I do about drones?

Many citizens are annoyed by their neighbors' drones, feeling they are being watched in their gardens or terraces. It also needs to be clarified, for example, what will happen to a photo taken by a neighbor with a drone of another property and the people on it. This can significantly reduce the quality of life and lead to psychological problems. So it's a no-brainer to consider shooting down drones. However, private individuals are not allowed to do so, which also makes sense given the context of uncontrollable crashes.

Only military and police forces can shoot down drones with different means, and their drone jammer can kill drones from a great distance from the ground. In addition, experiments are currently being conducted with eagles and trained to intercept drones. Whether police will use those tools, however, remains to be determined. To prevent harm. Only private individuals are allowed to capture drones to prevent out-of-control crashes. Private interference with drone signals is also prohibited. If you are disturbed by a neighbor's drone, you can call the police to clarify the matter accordingly.

Currently, security companies are no exception, as only national authorities and institutions can take active action against drones. A relaxation of this rule is being considered as it would be difficult to ensure the safety of thousands of football fans or concertgoers, especially at major events, without allowing private security companies to take countermeasures against drones.

Great Independence Day Sale! ! !

10% discount on our website right now.

Stack discount codes to get at least 20% off!

Maybe after two days the activity will disappear.

If you need, you can contact us to place an order.

Date: July 1st to July 7th

A quick and dirty guide to cell phone surveillance during protests

As an uprising of police brutality and institutionalized racism swept the country, many faced the full force of law enforcement weapons and surveillance for the first time. Whenever protesters, phones and police are in the same place, protesters should be concerned about cell phone surveillance. Often, security practitioners or other protesters will advise local law enforcement to respond to such concerns by using cell site simulators (also known as CSS, IMSI receivers, Stingray, Dirtbox, Hailstorm, Fake Station Base, or Crossbow). But a lot of times

The bottom line: There is little concrete evidence that the United States is using cellphone simulators against protesters. The threat of mobile phone simulators should not deter activists from voicing dissent or using mobile phones. On the other hand, since more than 85 local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies across the country have some type of CSS(some of which are used hundreds of times a year), it's not unreasonable to include cellular sites if you're going to participate in protests and take a few simple steps to protect yourself, include simulators in your security plan.

Locating a specific mobile device (and its owner) is rumored to be the most common use for cell site simulators by law enforcement, but conversely, it may be the least useful in the event of an incident. Locating specific people during protests is of little use because police can usually already see where everyone is using helicopters and other visual surveillance methods. However, in some cases, police may want to use CSS to discreetly track protesters instead of using on-site teams or helicopters.

Denial of service or signal jamming is an additional feature of CSS. In fact, the FBI has admitted that CSS can interfere with people's signals in the area. Unfortunately, for the same reason, it's hard to detect CSS usage and how often they intentionally or unintentionally interrupt services. What appears to be signal interference can also be overloading of cell towers and loss of connection. When many people suddenly gather in one place, the network can become overloaded with more traffic than it was designed for.

How does a drone RF jammer work?

There are a number of technologies in development aimed at preventing dangerous drones from entering no-fly zones or harming civilians. Among them, radio frequency (RF) jamming, or jammers, can be used to disrupt the RF signal of the drone, thus causing it to be disabled.

Rf jammers are designed to disrupt drones or drones by emitting RF electromagnetic noise, which drones use to operate and transmit video at levels high enough to disrupt any effective communication between the system and its pilot. Reference number

Typically, this RF interference occurs at 2.4GHz or 5.8GHz, which are public "unassigned" frequencies. Using these frequencies, wifi blocker do not interfere with manned aircraft, mobile communications, public broadcasting, or other dedicated radio bands.

Jammers can be effective against drones from miles away. Most RF jammers work by the ratio of the distance between the drone and the jammer to the distance between the drone and its pilot. In general, the farther the drone is from the pilot and the closer it is to the jammer, the better. The typical effective orientation of a jammer is a cone of about 15-30 degrees, protruding forward from the muzzle (this is also affected by the RF band and power of the jammer).

In addition to RF interference, GPS interference can also be used, as a large number of drones rely on GPS to balance the wind direction or navigate between predetermined points.

When a drone is intercepted by a signal from an RF uav jammer, the system typically returns to its origin (unless the GPS is also interfered with), allowing the user to track the drone.

Aircraft are especially vulnerable when GPS stops working. In addition to making navigation more difficult, systems that warn of the danger of colliding with other aircraft stopped working.

- We find that other authorities take the problem somewhat seriously, but are a little confused when it comes to solving it. Captain Aleksander Wasland of Vidler Island said it was very good news that the armed forces were interested and that there was also interest in civil aviation.

He himself was trapped twice.

"What really bothers us is that when the GPS is blocked, we have several systems that don't work, and that's a problem for flight safety," Vaslan said.

There is still some work to be done before the notification system can work. The signals picked up by the satellite this weekend will now be analyzed in the United States.

This is very exciting work, but it's too early to tell if the satellite successfully picked up the cell phone jamming signal we sent over the weekend. 'We'll know in the future,' Mr. Candola said.

Currently, there are only three satellites in the system, operated by the American company Hawkeye 360. Not enough to make an early warning system work optimally.

The three satellites are in polar orbits around the Earth, and they don't cover the entire planet at once. But the company plans to launch more satellites and then we will get better and more continuous coverage of Norway, "Kandola said.

Great Independence Day Sale! ! !

10% discount on our website right now.

Stack discount codes to get at least 20% off!

Maybe after two days the activity will disappear.

If you need, you can contact us to place an order.

Date: July 1st to July 7th

Great Independence Day Sale! ! !

10% discount on our website right now.

Stack discount codes to get at least 20% off!

Maybe after two days the activity will disappear.

If you need, you can contact us to place an order.

Date: July 1st to July 7th

Nissan is building signal jammers in its cars to eliminate cell phone interference

A car manufacturer has developed a compartment that blocks cell phone signals.

Nissan says the Signal Shield prototype, built into the armrest of the Juke crossover, will eliminate distractions from incoming calls, messages and social media notifications.

The box works on the principle of a Faraday cage (invented in the 1830s), which uses materials such as wire mesh to shield its contents from electromagnetic fields.

Once the lid is closed, all mobile, Bluetooth and Wi-Fi signals cannot reach the inside of the compartment.

The RAC survey of more than 1,700 UK motorists found that the proportion admitting to using a mobile phone while driving rose from 8% in 2014 to 31% last year.

In October, lorry driver Tomasz Kroker was jailed for 10 years after crashing a stationary car with his car while playing with his mobile phone on the A34 near Newbury, Berkshire, killing a woman and three children.

According to the UK's Department for Transport, 22 people were killed and 99 seriously injured in crashes on UK roads in 2015, in which drivers using mobile phones played a role.

RAC road safety spokesman Pete Williams said: "Our research shows that mobile phone use by drivers has reached epidemic proportions.

"With mobile phone technology advancing by leaps and bounds, many people have become addicted to it. However, using a mobile phone while driving is a physical and mental distraction and has been illegal since 2003.

"cell phone jammer is a great example of technology that can help drivers make smart phone calls.

"For those who can't avoid the temptation, this simple but smart enough technology offers them a valuable no-movement zone."

WiFi Cancellation Verification VS WiFi Jammer: What's the difference?

Terminology can sometimes confuse all of us. [Seytonic] does a good job of explaining the difference between a WiFi jammer and a cancellation validator in the video embedded below. Many of you already know the difference, but it's worth pointing it out because many refer to de-authenticating devices as "wifi blocker."

In their YouTube video, they explain that jammers emit a noise load on all WiFi channels, resulting in unusable frequencies within a given distance from the jammer. Jammers are also usually quite expensive and mostly illegal, making them hard to find unless you make your own.

WiFi de-validation, on the other hand, works in a very different way. WiFi sends unencrypted packets, called management frames. Because these are not encrypted, even if the network uses WPA2, a malicious party can send a de-authentication command to direct the user out of the access point. However, there is hope for 802.11w with encrypted management frames. It's been around for a while, but manufacturers don't seem willing to implement it, even though it could make WiFi devices more secure against such attacks.

Disassemble what you shouldn't have - GPS jammers

GPS jammers are easily available on the Internet. No, we won't link to them. However, truck drivers and others who own company cars often use GPS jammers, and they don't want their employers tracking their every move. Are these devices useful? Is it worth paying $25 for one?

These tiny individual boxes emit radio frequency of about 1575.42 MHz, the same frequency used by GPS satellites in high Earth orbit. These signals from GPS satellites are very, very weak and are relatively easily drowned out by noise. This is pretty much the block diagram for those cheap GPS jammers: Put the noise at the right frequency, and your phone or your boss's GPS tracker won't work. Note that this is a very low-tech attack; In theory, more sophisticated GPS jamming and spoofing techniques could allow drones to land safely.

The dismantling of the GPS jammer shows that the device is very simple. There are some 555s making low frequency noise. This provides the VCO with a signal in the 1466 to 1590 MHz range. The output of the VCO is then sent to a large RF transistor for amplification and output via a quarter-wave antenna. It may be RF magic, but it's a very simple circuit.

The output of this circuit was measured and, to the surprise of many, there were no stray emissions or harmonics - the jammer would not disable your phone or WiFi, only your GPS. The range of the device in the open air is estimated at 15-30 meters, which is more than enough if you're a truck driver. In a canyon of skyscrapers, this range can extend to hundreds of meters.