Counter-UAS Non-Kinetic Soft-Kill Technologies

 

Non-kinetic counter-drones collect data by interfering with or intercepting transmission signals. These approaches typically result in the drone plummeting to the ground at high speeds, making it an unappealing countermeasure to deploy above crowds. While it may not be suitable for usage over crowds, it may be beneficial in other situations. When contemplating drone countermeasures, always consult your country's regulations; drone jammer and drone spoofers are not authorized in the United States.

 

What exactly is a drone jammer?

 

Jammers operate by emitting electromagnetic noise at the radio frequencies used by drones to operate and transmit data. They effectively drown out a drone's and its operator's talk. This is commonly 2.4GHz or 5.8GHz, which are unlicensed, public frequencies. This prohibits jammers from interfering with piloted airplanes, mobile phones, public broadcasting, or other radio frequencies that are not in use.

 

Jammers can be permanent, mounted devices or extremely mobile, gun-like devices that allow someone to safely land a drone on the ground.

 

What happens when a drone becomes jammed?

The drone will either land or

The drone will return to its starting point.

 

What are the drawbacks of drone jamming?

 

Drone jammers are less effective against pre-programmed drones that fly a certain course, because drones may fly without GPS.

Drone jammer prevent the C-UAS from gaining positive control over its targets.

 

UAV jammers do not detect the pilot or the flight route.

Is it legal to use drone jammers?

 

According to FCC regulations, drone jammers are not authorized in the United States.

 

"The use of "cell jammers" or similar devices designed to intentionally block, jam, or interfere with authorized radio communications (signal blockers, gps blocker, or text stoppers, for example) is illegal under federal law." These devices endanger crucial public safety communications and can prohibit you and others from dialing 9-1-1 or other emergency numbers. Law enforcement communications can also be disrupted buy jammers.

 

Governing Law

"The 1934 Communications Act"

Section 301 - requires radio transmitter operators and users to be licensed or approved under the Commission's rules (47 U.S.C. 301).

Section 333 - forbids deliberate or malicious interference with radio transmissions of any station licensed or permitted by the Act or operated by the United States Government (47 U.S.C. 333)"

 

What exactly is a GPS drone spoofer?

 

Spoofers send phony GPS signals that imitate authentic ones, whereas jammers function by blocking RF frequencies. Spoofers take over a drone's communication link by sending out a fake signal that the device interprets as authentic because it is a replica of the original signal.

 

The spoofer operates by sending out a stronger counterfeit signal. The spoofer can generate a slight delay between the drone and the controller before emitting the louder bogus signal. The spoofer now has complete control of the gadget and can fly the drone. The GPS receiver is duped by the spoofer.

 

If your UAS device uses GPS for flying, GPS spoofing is difficult to defend against. GPS is a signal transmitted by satellites. GPS satellite transmissions cannot be protected using traditional security methods such as encryption and certifications.

Deliveries of banned materials to prison inmates via drone are becoming increasingly ambitious and bold around the world, but an aerial smuggling ring busted by police in western France stands out for its quasi-startup organization and efficiency.

 

This summer, four gang members were arrested after Nantes police launched an investigation into the movement of contraband phones and drugs found during cell phone blocker searches. What they discovered was not only a well-organized and frequently used system for delivering prey using a DJI Mini, but also a Snapchat-based method of acknowledging commands from within Clink.

 

The perpetrators even gave their illegal company a name: Air Colis

 

Police became aware of the plan when guards first spotted a drone jammer hovering outside the window of a prison in Nantes. The next morning, authorities discovered 36 smartphones and 1.6 kilograms of drugs hidden by inmates. A month later, staff at another regional correctional facility spotted a drone making similar nighttime deliveries — an activity that was repeated at two other regional prisons around the same time.

 

Drone deliveries were often made to all four prisons on the same night, prompting local military police to cautiously begin investigations. They gradually discovered an operation (albeit illegal) that could teach the beleaguered Amazon Prime Air a lot.

 

This is how it functioned

 

Inmates monitoring contraband sales in their respective prisons placed orders with an outside partner, who in turn contacted four Air Colis organizers. The weight of each drone's payload (whether drugs, iPhones or tobacco) is limited to 500 grams, and transport costs a flat rate of 400 euros ($422). The contraband flown in was exchanged at a not-so-remote clandestine meeting point (a McDonald's parking lot in Nantes), where it was weighed and photographed so that the prisoners could confirm that the content on the Snapchat was what they intended. What’s needed – a crime hedge against unsatisfied customers returning goods.

 

Nantes police, who busted the aerial quartet, said the drone-dropped shipments would be delivered directly to recipients waiting at the prison windows, and light jamming signal would be used to guide the ships to their location. The flights were flown in the middle of the night to four different prisons in western France, with each mission divided into five to ten missions, meaning multiple missions to the same prison were sometimes carried out in quick succession.

 

It is estimated that Air Colis made at least 50 shipments before police tracked down the gang in late September and revealed details of the operation.

 

The raid, which halted an illegal prison airlift, uncovered nine DJI Minis (including at least one original Mavic, according to police photos), several spare batteries, 500 grams of cocaine, a kilogram of marijuana and 900 euros ($950). Cash and thermal binoculars control the drone to identify the correct unit window at night.

 

"It's like an Uber delivering directly to the window," Nantes prosecutor Renaud Gaudeul said when announcing the arrest. "This is definitely not a trivial operation. As far as I know, France has never Things like this happen ... and it's good for criminals to see investigators doing their best as well."

 

If things continue this way, French police will need to further refine their counter-drone efforts. This summer alone, Air Colis is estimated to have transported more than 50 drones, bringing the number of confirmed drones entering French prisons in 2022 to 68, according to corrections officials. The number was more than 37 the year before. At this rate, the occupants of the car will be discovered the next time police conduct a search using a special app.

Latest News: A media article about multiple signal jammers disrupting French airport operations. Once the authorities discovered one, they discovered another, and then another!

Why It’s Important:

 

GPS interference at airports can cause flight delays.

 

Many airlines will not let the plane leave the gate without a good GPS lock.

 

We have already seen cases of outages affecting landing systems. See: Events in Denver-Newark

 

In the worst-case scenario, an outage, even an unexpected one, can result in loss of life. Check out the thrills of Sun Valley.

---

What Else to Know:

 

The EU STRIKE3 project has identified many cases of interference in or near airports.

 

News reports like this about flight delays happen from time to time.

 

In the United States, the FCC is the regulatory agency responsible for preventing such incidents and enforcing the rules.

 

uUnfortunately, over the past two decades, the FCC has significantly reduced the number of personnel and equipment suitable for the job.

---

ANFR Fighting against phone jammer

 

Candice Clark 18 July 2023

 

In France, the National Spectrum Administration (ANFR) is responsible for enforcing rules banning radio jammers, including those that interfere with GNSS services. The availability of GNSS data is critical for many critical applications, so disruptions to GPS, Galileo, GLONASS and Beidou are as serious as cyber attacks.

 

ANFR's sworn representatives have the authority to investigate violations of national spectrum use regulations. They are often used to locate active gps jammer, either on a vehicle or in a fixed location. Catherine Gabay, ANFR Deputy Director for Frequency Monitoring and Enforcement, reported on some recent cases during the 2023 International Symposium on Navigation and Timing Technologies (ITSNT) in Toulouse.

 

In March 2023, an instance happened near Merville airport. The Directorate General for Civil Aviation (DGAC) notified ANFR of interference on the L1 frequency, which was disrupting flights and air ambulance helicopters. ANFR agents quickly reviewed in-flight information and discovered a GNSS jammer aboard a commercial vehicle. The police were brought in to assist with the seizure of the equipment, and the driver was arrested.

Cellular interference involves the use of equipment that interferes with radio or wireless signals

Cell destruction can be done with a device placed about 30 feet away from the intended target or via a home camera.

 

CMPD says thieves have figured out how to bypass security cameras and use technology in some burglaries.

 

This is called "cell interference" and occurs when a person uses a device to interfere with a radio or wireless signal.

 

According to the Federal Communications Commission, "It is a violation of federal law to use a phone jammer, GPS blocker, or other signal jamming device designed to intentionally prevent, interfere with, or disrupt authorized radio communications." A business, classroom, residence or vehicle. "

 

Cell destruction can be done with a device placed about 30 feet away from the intended target or via a home camera.

 

Video from a south Charlotte neighborhood shows a suspect sneaking through yards at night, but not all of the incident was caught on camera.

 

"Anytime you have wireless devices, whether it's Wi-Fi or whatever, you know people are going to find a way - how to jam them, how to try to prevent something from communicating," CPI Security Customer Operations said.

 

Within a few moments, someone is visible on camera, but as cells burst, with the push of a button or button, the person disappears or is not recorded.

 

CMPD says this problem has been seen in some break-ins in south Charlotte

 

“We haven’t seen any activity like this, so we’re aware of that and the most important thing is making sure we have the best technology and the latest technology,” Shocknesse said.

 

WBTV asked him which devices are more susceptible to cellular interference

 

"I think it will work on some older wireless devices that don't have encryption," Shocknesse said.

 

Newer security systems and surveillance systems have better encryption and are more secure, he said.

 

“I really don’t think we can emphasize enough the importance of having cameras and some onboard video,” Shockness said. “The cameras we put in there are equipped with storage so if something goes wrong, you can still record what happened and report it to the police.”

 

To complement this advice, he said the best solution to prevent cell phone interference is to use current encryption technology and wired devices rather than WiFi.

 

To prevent break-ins, simple tricks such as maintaining good lighting, turning on alarm systems and trimming shrubs to a height of no more than one meter can be effective.

Drones are increasingly being used for phone a variety of purposes, from surveillance to package delivery to destroying equipment on the battlefield. The need to control and eliminate these devices is becoming increasingly urgent. Against this background, the "Drone Off" anti-drone rifle emerged and is currently on display at the Partner 2023 exhibition in Serbia. The device can phone interfere with communication signals between drones and their operators, providing an effective solution to potential drone threats.

Serbia showcased Drone Off, a new anti-drone rifle developed by the company Iritel Beograd. The ability to neutralize drones is phone vital to militaries, and many are trying to find solutions to counter drone dominance. This is a new addition to those efforts.

 

The rifle operates in phone multiple frequency ranges, specifically 1164-1610 MHz for GPS L1/L2 and Glonass and 2400-2500 MHz and 5700-5850 MHz for remote control and video transmission. The transmitting power is 78W, which can interfere with UAV signals within a radius of 2.5 kilometers. The rifle weighs 3 kg and the included backpack weighs 10 kg. It uses sweep/multiple sweep type jamming signal and is equipped with a helical antenna with a gain of 12 dBic and an angle of 42°. The rifle operates in a temperature range of -25°C to +50°C, is battery powered, and features a battery status indicator light.

 

There are a variety of counter-drone technologies on the market, from frequency phone jammer to lasers to birds trained to intercept drones. For example, LMADIS (Lightweight Mobile Air Defense Integrated System) is a portable drone jammer that entered service in July 2019 and successfully shot down an Iranian drone. Drone Off features portability and high transmit power, making it a viable option for a variety of scenarios.

 

The importance of such technology is phone particularly evident in conflict zones such as Ukraine. Drones are often used for reconnaissance, surveillance, and sometimes even to drop munitions. The ability to neutralize these drones can provide significant tactical advantages. Other devices, such as the EDM4S SkyWiper used by the Ukrainian Armed Forces, have also proven themselves in this regard.

 

With its impressive technical specifications and range, it provides a viable solution for suppressing drones in phone a variety of situations, including conflict zones such as Ukraine. The development and adoption of such technologies is critical to address the challenges posed by the increasing use of drones, not only on the battlefield but also in areas such as security.

PENTAGON: The United States Army is straining to phone fund the increasingly important electronic warfare wifi capabilities it has developed since the gps fall of the Soviet Union. The Army possesses over 32,000 short-range defensive jammer device to block roadside explosives, but an offensive handheld jammer will not be available until 2023, according to current plans.

 

"Can that be sped up?" "Yes," replied Col. Jeffrey Church, the Army's Pentagon staff's chief of electronic warfare. "Technology exists today that does a lot of things that we would like MFEW [the Multi-Function Electronic Warfare system] to do," he said, adding that some of it might even phone be purchased commercially by the Army.

 

However, with the Army decreasing faster than any other service and sequestration looming, "there's no money tree," Church told me in an interview. "So if you're going to grow a robust electronic warfare program, who's going to pay for that?"

where is the Army's electronic warfare today?

 

"I have a theory. I've got folks. "I have facilities," Church explained. "What we lack is equipment."

 

"If you go to a unit gps today in the Army and phone you say, let me see your 'electronic warfare equipment,' and you go to the EWO (Electronic Warfare Officer) and he opens up his wall locker, it's empty," Church went on to explain. "Right now, the Army relies on borrowing assets from other people," such as the Growler aircraft from the Navy.

 

"Our senior army leaders have known and continue to know that electronic warfare is something the Army must have," said Church, the Army's senior electronic warfare specialist. (The fact that the highest senior EWO is a colonel rather than a general demonstrates how nascent the field is). "It's a matter of resource prioritization and wifi where do you fall in those priorities."

 

What category does electronic warfare fit under? The Pentagon's fiscal 2016 budget contains $2.5 million for something called the Electronic Warfare Planning & Management Tool, which is a rounding error for a significant weapons program. EWPMT, which went into service in September 2016, is much-needed software that will allow electronic warfare forces to gather data from sensors such as Navy Growlers and the Army's DCGS-A intelligence network.

 

"EWPMT is what allows them to see the phone battlefield in the electromagnetic environment," Church explained, "so you can tell your commander, 'this is where we have interference.'" This is the situation. This is where the adversary is. I'm not sure what it is, but gps I'm getting some sort of signal."

EWPMT, on the other hand, is now a command-and-control system with nothing to command and control. The 32,000 CREWS gps blocker that defend wifi Army vehicles from roadside explosives are strong at short range, but they aren't connected to any type of network, so EWPMT can't utilize them as a data source, much alone manage them. For the particular circumstances of Afghanistan and Iraq, the Army possesses just a few longer-range systems purchased using emergency funding and/or quick equipping authorities.

 

"We got good technology into wifi the field to save soldiers' lives," he remarked. "We didn't get any programs of record, so we phone don't have budgets, we don't have base dollars."

 

The Multi-Function Electronic Warfare system is designed to address this issue. MFEW will be a network of sensors and wifi blocker deployed on various sized drones, ground vehicles ranging from Humvees to heavy trucks, stationary locations, troops' backpacks, and maybe helicopters.

 

Church underlined that, unlike Cold War electronic warfare units, MFEW will not require a specialized vehicle to carry it: "The Army can't afford it," he stated, and current miniaturized electronics don't require it. Instead, MFEW will ride on ground vehicles while they go about their regular tasks, giving data to and receiving commands from Army electronic warfare experts at the gps command post. MFEW will be another plug-and-play module on drones, to be used or not depending on the task, as many specialized sensors already are.

 

How near is this vision to becoming a reality? "Right now, MFEW is not a program," Church explained, limiting the Army's capacity to support it. MFEW is now a "concept" in the arduous process of becoming a formal Army requirement. "We're on about the fifth rewrite of the MFEW CDD (Capabilities Development Document)," Church stated in a statement. MFEW can become a program of record and receive base budget money after thephone CDD is completed and authorized.

 

The MFEW is expected to start service in 2023 and achieve full operational capability (FOC) in 2027. We're still playing catch-up till then.

 

"Guys like the Russians, guys like the Chinese, their surrogates, they've spent the last 20 years continuing the development and acquisition of an electronic warfare capability, whereas… the Army got out of the business," he stated. When the battlefield was brought back to life, he stated, "Army electronic warfare started from nothing, and it started from nothing in a combat environment where a lot of US soldiers were being killed or wounded due to the radio-controlled IED."

 

Church stated, "Now we have to take this to the phone next level, and MFEW is the next level."

 

Of course, all of this is taking place as the Pentagon's senior leadership assesses its electronic warfare portfolio. The newly formed Electronic Warfare Programs Council is the place to be; it is led by Frank Kendall, the undersecretary for acquisition, technology, and logistics, and Adm. James Winnefeld, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Electronic Jamming Tactics

 

Jamming has increased in sophistication as electronic warfare gps has developed and phone includes an array of tactics. Barrage jamming is performed against two or more frequencies phone. This can be useful when the aggressor does not know exactly which radio or radar frequencies their adversary is using. Nonetheless, they may know with reasonable gps certainty which phone waveband of frequencies they may be using. Spot jamming is performed against specific frequencies known to gps be in use.

 

The advent of solid-state electronics in the 1960s revolutionized jamming technology. It facilitates the development of complex phone digital radio frequency memory (DRFM) systems. These are particularly useful for jamming radar equipment. DRFM detects incoming radar signals, samples the signal, and then cleverly sounds an alert before retransmitting it to phone the radar. This new false signal could confuse radar by showing two or gps more targets where there used to be only one. The target may move faster or slower than its actual speed. This strategy is called deception gps jamming.

 

Likewise, DRFM can collect and send false signals to trick the radar into believing there is a more prominent or attractive target in its field of view than the one initially detected. This strategy is called temptation interference. In the long term, the emergence of artificial intelligence will make interference tactics and techniques increasingly sophisticated.

Jamming is the basis of the electronic attack mission. Electronic attack is a subset of the broader discipline of gps electronic warfare (EW), which is discussed in more detail elsewhere. Jamming was first used during World War II to attack radar and radio phone equipment. Both latter systems transmit phone radio signals. Radar does this to detect and track objects, radio does this to send and receive voice and data traffic.

 

In the simplest case, the purpose of cell phone jamming is to impair a radar or radio's ability to perform its mission, or even prevent them from completing it entirely. The jamming process also uses radio signals, but in a way that attacks these systems. Simply put, jamming is gps an attack using artificially generated radio interference. An example of how interference works can be seen when a car drives under power lines with the radio on. The sound of the radio was suddenly drowned out by interference. This is caused by electromagnetic radiation from power lines.

 

Interfering signals, called waveforms, are sent to the radar or radio's antenna. The antenna should detect the gps signal. To ensure this, the signal is sent at a frequency that the antenna can gps detect and that matches the phone frequency of the interfering target signal: If the radar sends a signal at a frequency of 3.6 GHz/GHz, the signal must be the same in the event of a malfunction.

 

However, successful radar or radio jamming depends on more than just the frequency of phone the interfering signal. Signal amplitude is also important. Let's consider a radio that receives amplitude traffic at a specific wattage. If the interfering signal is weaker than the signal received by the radio, these signals will remain uninterrupted. Interference signals were also detected, but were too weak to have a noticeable effect.

 

If the interfering signal is stronger than the traffic received by the gps radio, the former will be "washed away." In electronic warfare, jamming is effective when a radio or radar device is receiving rather than transmitting. This is because the incoming radio signal is already relatively weak. This reduces the power required for the signal jammers to be effective. To explain how improvisation works, imagine a violin soloist and a heavy rock band on the same stage. The solo violinist begins to play, but their music immediately becomes inaudible as the rock band begins. This does not mean that the phone violinist's music has stopped, just that the volume of the orchestra drowns out the soloist's voice.

There are three ways to determine the location of your Tracki GPS tracker using geolocation data.

 

1. Global Positioning System (GPS) functionality, which uses satellite signal jammers to determine location very accurately.

 

2. Connect to WiFi by tracking the router’s MAC ID. If Tracki GPS Tracker cannot find a GPS signal, it listens to all nearby WiFi routers and reports their MAC ID to our servers, which have access to a map of wifi blocker routers and their locations around the world. Accuracy is approximately 100-300 feet.

 

3. A less precise method is often called "cell tower triangulation," which refers to how cell towers calculate a tracker's geophysical location.

 

What is Cell Tower Triangulation?

 

In a perfect world, the GPS tracker's signal would be picked up by three or more cell towers, allowing triangulation to function. If you know the distance to a place from each of three unique points, you may compute the approximate position of that location in respect to the three reference points. We know the locations of the cell towers that receive our jammer GSM signal at Tracki because we have access to mapping of all cellular tower locations worldwide, and we can estimate the distance of the GPS tracker from each of those antenna towers based on the lag time between when the tower sends a ping to Tracki GPS tracker and receives the answering ping back.

In rare situations, a GPS tracker's signal may be received by more than three cell towers, providing for even greater precision. Because there are frequently many cell towers with overlapping signal coverage regions in big metropolitan urban areas, GPS tracker pinpointing accuracy is pretty good. When the GPS tracker is not exposed to the open sky, such as when it is within a building or underground, and there are no Wi-Fi networks nearby, cell tower triangulation may be the only means to determine location if GPS signal is not accessible.

 

However, there are numerous areas with fewer cell towers available, such as on the outskirts of towns and in rural areas. When there are less than three cell towers accessible, locating a anti-tracking jammer device becomes significantly less precise. To have good coverage in cities with a lot more vertical structures that might be obstacles to GPS tracker transmitting and receiving, there must be a lot more cell towers spread. There are fewer cell towers in the countryside, and a GPS tracker's signal may be picked up by only one tower at a considerably longer distance.

Those places where the GPS tracker is only picked up by a single tower, and if it just has a single omnidirectional antenna, the accuracy is considerably worse.

 

Tracking accuracy in rural locations might range from 0.25 mile to several miles, depending on how many obstructions may be obstructing the tower's signal.

 

How does a GPS tracker work?

 

GPS, or global positioning system, uses 24 to 32 solar-powered satellites and ground stations to relay data to GPS-enabled devices.

 

The primary goal of GPS systems is to identify the exact location of an object or person in real time. The global navigation satellite system (GNSS) network is used by GPS tracking systems. Each satellite in orbit transmits microwave signals to a receiver. The GPS tracker's receiver then utilizes these signals to compute your precise location from at least four GPS satellites. Finally, your location is calculated when the system triangulates your actual position on the earth based on these distances to the closest meters.

 

The method is based on a basic mathematical idea known as trilateration. GPS receivers use the exact location of at least four satellites and the distance between them to estimate four values: earth latitude, earth longitude, elevation, and time. The position of the receiver is determined by the position and distances to a certain satellite. The precise position of a satellite is regularly sent to all receivers within line of sight, which normally necessitates an unobstructed sky. The precise moment the satellite broadcast arrives at the receiver determines the distance to a satellite. The time created by each satellite's atomic clock is relayed at predetermined intervals by the satellite.

What a GPS Tracking Device Is and How It Works

 

GPS tracking devices operate on the same concept, but instead of displaying information on the device, the gadget's CPU calculates its location and transmits the resulting data to a server over the Internet via the international GSM cellular network. That server offers a platform from which end users may monitor the device's present and historical path, speed, and alarms. All of this data is then delivered over the internet and shown on a desktop software or a smart phone jammer utilizing an iPhone or Android app.

 

Anyone may profit from a GPS tracking device. It may be used by company owners to monitor fleets, staff conduct, and by households to keep track of elderly, children, or pets. To prevent their luggage from being lost or stolen, travelers embed a GPS tracker in it.

 

Active trackers, on the other hand, use a SIM and a GSM transceiver to process and send data in real time. Dispatchers receive real-time information via the GSM cellular network, allowing them to keep a close eye on their assets or valuables. Cellular network services are paid for with monthly fees.

 

In the event that the GPS satellites signal is obstructed due to being indoors or by a structure, and there is no sky, the device looks for cell tower signals and attempts to determine rough position using cell tower signal strength triangulation.

 

The GPS tracker determine where the device is located and roughly estimate the distance between the cellphone towers by interpolating signals between adjacent towers. A precision of down to 300 feet may be obtained in urban areas where density of cellphone towers is very high. Rural and county side areas which has less towers per square mile may see many miles between base stations and therefore inaccurately determine locations often showing a location miles away from the device real location.

 

For conclusion, when GPS satellite signal is available that is preferable to use. But in those cases when a GPS tracking device is blocked from open sky by structures, tall buildings, trees or even heavy clouds, cell tower approximation can mean the difference between knowing a general area whereabouts of GPS tracker or being in a complete dark.

As a professional photographer and drone pilot, I've seen firsthand how drone technology has become mainstream (pun intended) in recent years.

 

But with great power comes great responsibility, and as our skies become increasingly filled with these high-tech devices, the need for regulatory and control measures becomes increasingly clear.

 

Enter the world of drone jammers.

 

In this article, we’ll explore the ins and outs of drone jammers, from basic functionality to legality. We will also discuss some practical applications of this technology.

 

Whether you're a drone enthusiast interested in the technology, a security professional looking to learn about drone defenses, or someone just concerned about privacy, this guide is for you and her.

Introduction to drone defense technology

 

Okay, guys, let’s get down to business. What exactly is a drone jammer? Why should we care?

 

What is a drone jammer?

 

Imagine you are flying your drone and taking stunning aerial shots, and suddenly your drone starts to react. It doesn't respond to your controls and seems to have a mind of its own. My friend, you may have just encountered a drone jammer.

 

Simply put, a drone jammer is a device designed to interrupt the control signal of a drone.

 

It acts like a drone party killer, ruining the party by emitting electromagnetic noise on certain radio frequencies.

 

These frequencies cover the same radio and GPS signals the drone uses to operate, effectively grounding it.

 

The development of drone technology

 

Now you might be asking yourself, "Why would anyone want to stop drones?" Well, like any technology, drones can be a double-edged sword. On the one hand, they've revolutionized industries from film production to agriculture, providing a bird's-eye view that was previously only possible via expensive helicopter flights.

 

On the other hand, they also found a whole lot of mess when it came to privacy and security issues. Imagine a drone hovering outside your window, or worse yet, a drone being used for illegal activity. Not that funny, right?

 

The need for drone jammers

 

This is where drone jammers come into play. They're essentially a way to keep drones away from places they're not supposed to go. Think of them as the gatekeepers of the sky, preventing unwanted drones from entering restricted airspace.

 

But it's not just a matter of privacy and security. Drone jammers also play a vital role in ensuring safety. Because the last thing you want is for a drone to collide with a passenger plane.

 

How drone jammers work

 

Picture this: you are attending a rock concert and trying to have a conversation with your friend. But the music is too loud and you can't hear each other. This is essentially how a jammer works.

 

Drone jammers emit electromagnetic noise at certain radio frequencies, similar to loud music at a concert. This noise drowns out the radio and jammer GPS signals the drones use to operate, effectively drowning them out.

 

The impact of drone jammers on drones

 

So what happens when a drone is hit by a jammer signal? Well, it's a bit like getting lost in a strange city without a map.

 

Most drones respond to jamming signal by returning to their starting point. This is their way of saying: "I'm lost and I'm going home." In some cases, a drone jammer can land a drone at a scene for forensic investigation.

 

How to jam drone signals

 

Now, before you get any ideas, I want to make one thing clear: jamming drone signals should not be attempted at home. This is a complex process that requires a deep understanding of radio frequencies and drone technology. Plus, it's illegal in a lot of places (but we'll get to that later).

 

That being said, it’s still interesting to understand how the process works. A drone jammer’s frequency is generally assigned at 2.4Ghz or 5.8Ghz, which are public frequencies not assigned to manned aircraft, public broadcasts, or cell phone signals.

 

The jammer projects its signal in the shape of a cone, and when a drone gets hit with the signal, it typically returns back to its point of origin or lands on the spot.

According to a report in Israel-based newspaper Haaretz, the Israeli Defense Forces intensified GPS jamming in the region to prevent drone assaults by Hamas and Hezbollah.

 

According to the IDF, Israel is interrupting satellite navigation systems "proactively for various operational needs." "Citizens should be aware that the disruption can cause various and temporary effects on location-based applications," the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) told Haaretz.

According to the analysis, this will have two effects on GPS services. For starters, GPS signal reception can be fully disabled. Second, it may be faked, which means it can send bogus location data to the device.

 

GPS receivers may be found in mobile phones jammer phone, aircraft, ships, and vehicles. They receive signals from many satellites at the same time and utilize them to compute their own precise location and altitude.

 

These identical receivers may also be found on cruise missiles and drones, where they are used to direct them to their destination. Any army organization interested in thwarting such an attack may emit forcefully on the required frequency band, preventing the GPS blocker device from receiving any satellite signal and completely disabling its operation.

 

Spoofing is a technique in which the signal mimics the genuine satellite signal and hijacks the GPS receiver. Once the receiver has locked on to the bogus signal, the disrupter will supply it with fake data, forcing it to compute and show an inaccurate position and altitude. This can result in the receiver reporting its genuine position dozens, if not hundreds, of kilometers away.

 

According to Haaretz, Israelis had GPS troubles last week because the IDF was apparently attempting to prevent Hezbollah's GPS-guided drones from entering far into Israel.

 

The publication said that Israelis are being impacted, citing an example in which a person from Haifa said his phone incorrectly indicated his position as being in the northern border area while being in Haifa. Residents in the West Bank said that their phones notified them that they were close to the Gaza border.

 

However, this may cause problems with the IDF HomeFront Command app, which provides information based on the user's phone location. According to the publication, blocking the app or the GPS transmitter on people's phones might result in a false signal.